Closed subgroups of abelian groupsEmbedded Lie subgroups are closed.The injectivity of torus in the category of abelian Lie groupsCenter of compact lie group closed?Closedness of connected semisimple Lie subgroups of semisimple groupsIntersection of a family of closed Lie subgroupsExamples about maximal Abelian subgroup is not a maximal torus in compact connected Lie group $G$.A question on abelian Lie groups and maximal compact subgroupReal and complex nilpotent Lie groupsClosed Subgroups of Lie Groups are closed Lie Subgroups?Lattice and abelian Lie groups

How is the claim "I am in New York only if I am in America" the same as "If I am in New York, then I am in America?

What does "enim et" mean?

Can an x86 CPU running in real mode be considered to be basically an 8086 CPU?

Schwarzchild Radius of the Universe

Can you lasso down a wizard who is using the Levitate spell?

Circuitry of TV splitters

What typically incentivizes a professor to change jobs to a lower ranking university?

Copycat chess is back

XeLaTeX and pdfLaTeX ignore hyphenation

Is it possible to make sharp wind that can cut stuff from afar?

How do I create uniquely male characters?

"The augmented fourth (A4) and the diminished fifth (d5) are the only augmented and diminished intervals that appear in diatonic scales"

How to register event with useEffect hooks?

DOS, create pipe for stdin/stdout of command.com(or 4dos.com) in C or Batch?

Is there a familial term for apples and pears?

Where to refill my bottle in India?

How to use Pandas to get the count of every combination inclusive

New order #4: World

Infinite past with a beginning?

Modification to Chariots for Heavy Cavalry Analogue for 4-armed race

How do we improve the relationship with a client software team that performs poorly and is becoming less collaborative?

What is the offset in a seaplane's hull?

Finding files for which a command fails

How does one intimidate enemies without having the capacity for violence?



Closed subgroups of abelian groups


Embedded Lie subgroups are closed.The injectivity of torus in the category of abelian Lie groupsCenter of compact lie group closed?Closedness of connected semisimple Lie subgroups of semisimple groupsIntersection of a family of closed Lie subgroupsExamples about maximal Abelian subgroup is not a maximal torus in compact connected Lie group $G$.A question on abelian Lie groups and maximal compact subgroupReal and complex nilpotent Lie groupsClosed Subgroups of Lie Groups are closed Lie Subgroups?Lattice and abelian Lie groups













3












$begingroup$


What is an example of an abelian Lie group $G$ and a closed subgroup $H$ such that $Gnotcong G/H times H$?



Would the circle $S^1$ in $mathbb R^2$ be an example? what is $mathbb R^2/S^1$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Isn't $G=mathbbR$ and $H=mathbbZ$ an example of the non-iso you want? All you need to show is that $mathbbR$ is not iso to $S^1 times mathbbZ$. That's easy.
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    3 hours ago
















3












$begingroup$


What is an example of an abelian Lie group $G$ and a closed subgroup $H$ such that $Gnotcong G/H times H$?



Would the circle $S^1$ in $mathbb R^2$ be an example? what is $mathbb R^2/S^1$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Isn't $G=mathbbR$ and $H=mathbbZ$ an example of the non-iso you want? All you need to show is that $mathbbR$ is not iso to $S^1 times mathbbZ$. That's easy.
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    3 hours ago














3












3








3





$begingroup$


What is an example of an abelian Lie group $G$ and a closed subgroup $H$ such that $Gnotcong G/H times H$?



Would the circle $S^1$ in $mathbb R^2$ be an example? what is $mathbb R^2/S^1$?










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




What is an example of an abelian Lie group $G$ and a closed subgroup $H$ such that $Gnotcong G/H times H$?



Would the circle $S^1$ in $mathbb R^2$ be an example? what is $mathbb R^2/S^1$?







general-topology differential-geometry lie-groups lie-algebras






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 5 hours ago









Clayton

19.6k33288




19.6k33288










asked 5 hours ago









Amrat AAmrat A

345111




345111







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Isn't $G=mathbbR$ and $H=mathbbZ$ an example of the non-iso you want? All you need to show is that $mathbbR$ is not iso to $S^1 times mathbbZ$. That's easy.
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    3 hours ago













  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Isn't $G=mathbbR$ and $H=mathbbZ$ an example of the non-iso you want? All you need to show is that $mathbbR$ is not iso to $S^1 times mathbbZ$. That's easy.
    $endgroup$
    – Randall
    3 hours ago








2




2




$begingroup$
Isn't $G=mathbbR$ and $H=mathbbZ$ an example of the non-iso you want? All you need to show is that $mathbbR$ is not iso to $S^1 times mathbbZ$. That's easy.
$endgroup$
– Randall
3 hours ago





$begingroup$
Isn't $G=mathbbR$ and $H=mathbbZ$ an example of the non-iso you want? All you need to show is that $mathbbR$ is not iso to $S^1 times mathbbZ$. That's easy.
$endgroup$
– Randall
3 hours ago











2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















2












$begingroup$

EDIT: To be clear I was doing the case when $H$ was assumed connected. The disconnected case is handled below by Randall.



Every connected real abelian Lie group $G$ is isomorphic to $mathbbR^mtimes (S^1)^n$ for some $n$. In fact, given $G$ you can read off $n$ and $m$ as $n=mathrmrank(pi_1(G))$ and $m=dim G-n$.



Now, if you have a short exact sequence of abelian Lie groups



$$0to Hto Gto G/Hto 0$$



Then evidentily $dim G=dim H+dim G/H$. Moreover, since this is fibration, the groups are connected, and have vanishing second homotopy groups you also get a short exact sequence



$$0to pi_1(H)topi_1(G)topi_1(G/H)to 0$$



So, $mathrmrank(pi_1(G))=mathrmrank(pi_1(H))+mathrmrank(pi_1(G/H))$. Combining these two gives that $Gcong Htimes G/H$ as desired



EDIT: Here are more details. To show that $Gcong Htimes (G/H)$ it suffices to show that



$$mathrmrk(pi_1(G))=mathrmrk(pi_1(Htimes (G/H))=mathrmrk(pi_1(G))+mathrmrk(pi_1(G/H))$$



and



$$mathrmdim(G)-mathrmrk(pi_1(G))=dim(Gtimes (G/H))-mathrmrk(pi_1(Htimes (G/H))$$



The first equality holds by remark about the long exact sequence on homotopy groups from the fibration. The second is given as follows:



$$beginaligneddim(G)-mathrmrk(pi_1(G)) &= dim(H)+dim(G/H)-(mathrmrk(pi_1(H))+mathrmrk(pi_1(G/H))\ &= dim(Gtimes G/H))-mathrmrank(pi_1(Gtimes (G/H)))endaligned$$




(Below is for the non-abelian situation)
Here's a simple interesting example.



Take $mathrmGL_2(mathbbC)$ with its center $Z:=lambda I_2:lambdainmathbbC^times$. Then, $mathrmGL_2(mathbbC)/Zcong mathrmPGL_2(mathbbC)$. To see that $mathrmGL_2(mathbbC)notcong ZtimesmathrmPGL_2(mathbbC)$ note that the derived (i.e. commutative) subgroup of the former is $mathrmSL_2(mathbbC)$ whereas the latter is $mathrmPGL_2(mathbbC)$. Of course, these groups aren't isomorphic as the former is simply connected and the latter is not.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much Alex. So the bundle $Gto G/H$ is always trivial!
    $endgroup$
    – Amrat A
    5 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @AmratA No problem. Did you see the updated affirmative answer to the abelian situation?
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Oh yes, I just did. Thanks again!
    $endgroup$
    – Amrat A
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AmratA This is not true. Be careful, I didn't even necessarily claim that the fibration is trivial in my proof. I just proved that abstractly $Gcong Htimes (G/H)$, not that the sequence splits.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AmratA Updated.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    4 hours ago


















4












$begingroup$

Take $G = mathbbR$ and $H=mathbbZ$. The quotient $G/H$ is the circle $S^1$. The question is now to compare $mathbbR$ to $S^1 times mathbbZ$. Now, whether you interpret $ncong$ as "not topologically iso" or "not group iso" doesn't matter, as this is a counterexample to both at once. Topologically they are distinct as $mathbbR$ is connected but $S^1 times mathbbZ$ is not (it's a stack of circles). Algebraically they're also distinct by looking at elements of order $2$ ($mathbbR$ has none, $S^1 times mathbbZ$ has at least one).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    As I said in response to your comment, I generally only think about connected groups, so made that assumption (perhaps unfairly for the OP). The disconnected case as you've mentioned is quite obviously no. I edited my post to reflect this.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    3 hours ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function ()
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function ()
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix)
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
);
);
, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function()
var channelOptions =
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
;
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
createEditor();
);

else
createEditor();

);

function createEditor()
StackExchange.prepareEditor(
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader:
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
,
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
);



);













draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3179002%2fclosed-subgroups-of-abelian-groups%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes








2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









2












$begingroup$

EDIT: To be clear I was doing the case when $H$ was assumed connected. The disconnected case is handled below by Randall.



Every connected real abelian Lie group $G$ is isomorphic to $mathbbR^mtimes (S^1)^n$ for some $n$. In fact, given $G$ you can read off $n$ and $m$ as $n=mathrmrank(pi_1(G))$ and $m=dim G-n$.



Now, if you have a short exact sequence of abelian Lie groups



$$0to Hto Gto G/Hto 0$$



Then evidentily $dim G=dim H+dim G/H$. Moreover, since this is fibration, the groups are connected, and have vanishing second homotopy groups you also get a short exact sequence



$$0to pi_1(H)topi_1(G)topi_1(G/H)to 0$$



So, $mathrmrank(pi_1(G))=mathrmrank(pi_1(H))+mathrmrank(pi_1(G/H))$. Combining these two gives that $Gcong Htimes G/H$ as desired



EDIT: Here are more details. To show that $Gcong Htimes (G/H)$ it suffices to show that



$$mathrmrk(pi_1(G))=mathrmrk(pi_1(Htimes (G/H))=mathrmrk(pi_1(G))+mathrmrk(pi_1(G/H))$$



and



$$mathrmdim(G)-mathrmrk(pi_1(G))=dim(Gtimes (G/H))-mathrmrk(pi_1(Htimes (G/H))$$



The first equality holds by remark about the long exact sequence on homotopy groups from the fibration. The second is given as follows:



$$beginaligneddim(G)-mathrmrk(pi_1(G)) &= dim(H)+dim(G/H)-(mathrmrk(pi_1(H))+mathrmrk(pi_1(G/H))\ &= dim(Gtimes G/H))-mathrmrank(pi_1(Gtimes (G/H)))endaligned$$




(Below is for the non-abelian situation)
Here's a simple interesting example.



Take $mathrmGL_2(mathbbC)$ with its center $Z:=lambda I_2:lambdainmathbbC^times$. Then, $mathrmGL_2(mathbbC)/Zcong mathrmPGL_2(mathbbC)$. To see that $mathrmGL_2(mathbbC)notcong ZtimesmathrmPGL_2(mathbbC)$ note that the derived (i.e. commutative) subgroup of the former is $mathrmSL_2(mathbbC)$ whereas the latter is $mathrmPGL_2(mathbbC)$. Of course, these groups aren't isomorphic as the former is simply connected and the latter is not.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much Alex. So the bundle $Gto G/H$ is always trivial!
    $endgroup$
    – Amrat A
    5 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @AmratA No problem. Did you see the updated affirmative answer to the abelian situation?
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Oh yes, I just did. Thanks again!
    $endgroup$
    – Amrat A
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AmratA This is not true. Be careful, I didn't even necessarily claim that the fibration is trivial in my proof. I just proved that abstractly $Gcong Htimes (G/H)$, not that the sequence splits.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AmratA Updated.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    4 hours ago















2












$begingroup$

EDIT: To be clear I was doing the case when $H$ was assumed connected. The disconnected case is handled below by Randall.



Every connected real abelian Lie group $G$ is isomorphic to $mathbbR^mtimes (S^1)^n$ for some $n$. In fact, given $G$ you can read off $n$ and $m$ as $n=mathrmrank(pi_1(G))$ and $m=dim G-n$.



Now, if you have a short exact sequence of abelian Lie groups



$$0to Hto Gto G/Hto 0$$



Then evidentily $dim G=dim H+dim G/H$. Moreover, since this is fibration, the groups are connected, and have vanishing second homotopy groups you also get a short exact sequence



$$0to pi_1(H)topi_1(G)topi_1(G/H)to 0$$



So, $mathrmrank(pi_1(G))=mathrmrank(pi_1(H))+mathrmrank(pi_1(G/H))$. Combining these two gives that $Gcong Htimes G/H$ as desired



EDIT: Here are more details. To show that $Gcong Htimes (G/H)$ it suffices to show that



$$mathrmrk(pi_1(G))=mathrmrk(pi_1(Htimes (G/H))=mathrmrk(pi_1(G))+mathrmrk(pi_1(G/H))$$



and



$$mathrmdim(G)-mathrmrk(pi_1(G))=dim(Gtimes (G/H))-mathrmrk(pi_1(Htimes (G/H))$$



The first equality holds by remark about the long exact sequence on homotopy groups from the fibration. The second is given as follows:



$$beginaligneddim(G)-mathrmrk(pi_1(G)) &= dim(H)+dim(G/H)-(mathrmrk(pi_1(H))+mathrmrk(pi_1(G/H))\ &= dim(Gtimes G/H))-mathrmrank(pi_1(Gtimes (G/H)))endaligned$$




(Below is for the non-abelian situation)
Here's a simple interesting example.



Take $mathrmGL_2(mathbbC)$ with its center $Z:=lambda I_2:lambdainmathbbC^times$. Then, $mathrmGL_2(mathbbC)/Zcong mathrmPGL_2(mathbbC)$. To see that $mathrmGL_2(mathbbC)notcong ZtimesmathrmPGL_2(mathbbC)$ note that the derived (i.e. commutative) subgroup of the former is $mathrmSL_2(mathbbC)$ whereas the latter is $mathrmPGL_2(mathbbC)$. Of course, these groups aren't isomorphic as the former is simply connected and the latter is not.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much Alex. So the bundle $Gto G/H$ is always trivial!
    $endgroup$
    – Amrat A
    5 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @AmratA No problem. Did you see the updated affirmative answer to the abelian situation?
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Oh yes, I just did. Thanks again!
    $endgroup$
    – Amrat A
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AmratA This is not true. Be careful, I didn't even necessarily claim that the fibration is trivial in my proof. I just proved that abstractly $Gcong Htimes (G/H)$, not that the sequence splits.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AmratA Updated.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    4 hours ago













2












2








2





$begingroup$

EDIT: To be clear I was doing the case when $H$ was assumed connected. The disconnected case is handled below by Randall.



Every connected real abelian Lie group $G$ is isomorphic to $mathbbR^mtimes (S^1)^n$ for some $n$. In fact, given $G$ you can read off $n$ and $m$ as $n=mathrmrank(pi_1(G))$ and $m=dim G-n$.



Now, if you have a short exact sequence of abelian Lie groups



$$0to Hto Gto G/Hto 0$$



Then evidentily $dim G=dim H+dim G/H$. Moreover, since this is fibration, the groups are connected, and have vanishing second homotopy groups you also get a short exact sequence



$$0to pi_1(H)topi_1(G)topi_1(G/H)to 0$$



So, $mathrmrank(pi_1(G))=mathrmrank(pi_1(H))+mathrmrank(pi_1(G/H))$. Combining these two gives that $Gcong Htimes G/H$ as desired



EDIT: Here are more details. To show that $Gcong Htimes (G/H)$ it suffices to show that



$$mathrmrk(pi_1(G))=mathrmrk(pi_1(Htimes (G/H))=mathrmrk(pi_1(G))+mathrmrk(pi_1(G/H))$$



and



$$mathrmdim(G)-mathrmrk(pi_1(G))=dim(Gtimes (G/H))-mathrmrk(pi_1(Htimes (G/H))$$



The first equality holds by remark about the long exact sequence on homotopy groups from the fibration. The second is given as follows:



$$beginaligneddim(G)-mathrmrk(pi_1(G)) &= dim(H)+dim(G/H)-(mathrmrk(pi_1(H))+mathrmrk(pi_1(G/H))\ &= dim(Gtimes G/H))-mathrmrank(pi_1(Gtimes (G/H)))endaligned$$




(Below is for the non-abelian situation)
Here's a simple interesting example.



Take $mathrmGL_2(mathbbC)$ with its center $Z:=lambda I_2:lambdainmathbbC^times$. Then, $mathrmGL_2(mathbbC)/Zcong mathrmPGL_2(mathbbC)$. To see that $mathrmGL_2(mathbbC)notcong ZtimesmathrmPGL_2(mathbbC)$ note that the derived (i.e. commutative) subgroup of the former is $mathrmSL_2(mathbbC)$ whereas the latter is $mathrmPGL_2(mathbbC)$. Of course, these groups aren't isomorphic as the former is simply connected and the latter is not.






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



EDIT: To be clear I was doing the case when $H$ was assumed connected. The disconnected case is handled below by Randall.



Every connected real abelian Lie group $G$ is isomorphic to $mathbbR^mtimes (S^1)^n$ for some $n$. In fact, given $G$ you can read off $n$ and $m$ as $n=mathrmrank(pi_1(G))$ and $m=dim G-n$.



Now, if you have a short exact sequence of abelian Lie groups



$$0to Hto Gto G/Hto 0$$



Then evidentily $dim G=dim H+dim G/H$. Moreover, since this is fibration, the groups are connected, and have vanishing second homotopy groups you also get a short exact sequence



$$0to pi_1(H)topi_1(G)topi_1(G/H)to 0$$



So, $mathrmrank(pi_1(G))=mathrmrank(pi_1(H))+mathrmrank(pi_1(G/H))$. Combining these two gives that $Gcong Htimes G/H$ as desired



EDIT: Here are more details. To show that $Gcong Htimes (G/H)$ it suffices to show that



$$mathrmrk(pi_1(G))=mathrmrk(pi_1(Htimes (G/H))=mathrmrk(pi_1(G))+mathrmrk(pi_1(G/H))$$



and



$$mathrmdim(G)-mathrmrk(pi_1(G))=dim(Gtimes (G/H))-mathrmrk(pi_1(Htimes (G/H))$$



The first equality holds by remark about the long exact sequence on homotopy groups from the fibration. The second is given as follows:



$$beginaligneddim(G)-mathrmrk(pi_1(G)) &= dim(H)+dim(G/H)-(mathrmrk(pi_1(H))+mathrmrk(pi_1(G/H))\ &= dim(Gtimes G/H))-mathrmrank(pi_1(Gtimes (G/H)))endaligned$$




(Below is for the non-abelian situation)
Here's a simple interesting example.



Take $mathrmGL_2(mathbbC)$ with its center $Z:=lambda I_2:lambdainmathbbC^times$. Then, $mathrmGL_2(mathbbC)/Zcong mathrmPGL_2(mathbbC)$. To see that $mathrmGL_2(mathbbC)notcong ZtimesmathrmPGL_2(mathbbC)$ note that the derived (i.e. commutative) subgroup of the former is $mathrmSL_2(mathbbC)$ whereas the latter is $mathrmPGL_2(mathbbC)$. Of course, these groups aren't isomorphic as the former is simply connected and the latter is not.







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited 3 hours ago

























answered 5 hours ago









Alex YoucisAlex Youcis

36.1k775115




36.1k775115











  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much Alex. So the bundle $Gto G/H$ is always trivial!
    $endgroup$
    – Amrat A
    5 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @AmratA No problem. Did you see the updated affirmative answer to the abelian situation?
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Oh yes, I just did. Thanks again!
    $endgroup$
    – Amrat A
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AmratA This is not true. Be careful, I didn't even necessarily claim that the fibration is trivial in my proof. I just proved that abstractly $Gcong Htimes (G/H)$, not that the sequence splits.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AmratA Updated.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    4 hours ago
















  • $begingroup$
    Thank you very much Alex. So the bundle $Gto G/H$ is always trivial!
    $endgroup$
    – Amrat A
    5 hours ago











  • $begingroup$
    @AmratA No problem. Did you see the updated affirmative answer to the abelian situation?
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Oh yes, I just did. Thanks again!
    $endgroup$
    – Amrat A
    5 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AmratA This is not true. Be careful, I didn't even necessarily claim that the fibration is trivial in my proof. I just proved that abstractly $Gcong Htimes (G/H)$, not that the sequence splits.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    4 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    @AmratA Updated.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    4 hours ago















$begingroup$
Thank you very much Alex. So the bundle $Gto G/H$ is always trivial!
$endgroup$
– Amrat A
5 hours ago





$begingroup$
Thank you very much Alex. So the bundle $Gto G/H$ is always trivial!
$endgroup$
– Amrat A
5 hours ago













$begingroup$
@AmratA No problem. Did you see the updated affirmative answer to the abelian situation?
$endgroup$
– Alex Youcis
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
@AmratA No problem. Did you see the updated affirmative answer to the abelian situation?
$endgroup$
– Alex Youcis
5 hours ago












$begingroup$
Oh yes, I just did. Thanks again!
$endgroup$
– Amrat A
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
Oh yes, I just did. Thanks again!
$endgroup$
– Amrat A
5 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@AmratA This is not true. Be careful, I didn't even necessarily claim that the fibration is trivial in my proof. I just proved that abstractly $Gcong Htimes (G/H)$, not that the sequence splits.
$endgroup$
– Alex Youcis
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
@AmratA This is not true. Be careful, I didn't even necessarily claim that the fibration is trivial in my proof. I just proved that abstractly $Gcong Htimes (G/H)$, not that the sequence splits.
$endgroup$
– Alex Youcis
4 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
@AmratA Updated.
$endgroup$
– Alex Youcis
4 hours ago




$begingroup$
@AmratA Updated.
$endgroup$
– Alex Youcis
4 hours ago











4












$begingroup$

Take $G = mathbbR$ and $H=mathbbZ$. The quotient $G/H$ is the circle $S^1$. The question is now to compare $mathbbR$ to $S^1 times mathbbZ$. Now, whether you interpret $ncong$ as "not topologically iso" or "not group iso" doesn't matter, as this is a counterexample to both at once. Topologically they are distinct as $mathbbR$ is connected but $S^1 times mathbbZ$ is not (it's a stack of circles). Algebraically they're also distinct by looking at elements of order $2$ ($mathbbR$ has none, $S^1 times mathbbZ$ has at least one).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    As I said in response to your comment, I generally only think about connected groups, so made that assumption (perhaps unfairly for the OP). The disconnected case as you've mentioned is quite obviously no. I edited my post to reflect this.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    3 hours ago















4












$begingroup$

Take $G = mathbbR$ and $H=mathbbZ$. The quotient $G/H$ is the circle $S^1$. The question is now to compare $mathbbR$ to $S^1 times mathbbZ$. Now, whether you interpret $ncong$ as "not topologically iso" or "not group iso" doesn't matter, as this is a counterexample to both at once. Topologically they are distinct as $mathbbR$ is connected but $S^1 times mathbbZ$ is not (it's a stack of circles). Algebraically they're also distinct by looking at elements of order $2$ ($mathbbR$ has none, $S^1 times mathbbZ$ has at least one).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    As I said in response to your comment, I generally only think about connected groups, so made that assumption (perhaps unfairly for the OP). The disconnected case as you've mentioned is quite obviously no. I edited my post to reflect this.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    3 hours ago













4












4








4





$begingroup$

Take $G = mathbbR$ and $H=mathbbZ$. The quotient $G/H$ is the circle $S^1$. The question is now to compare $mathbbR$ to $S^1 times mathbbZ$. Now, whether you interpret $ncong$ as "not topologically iso" or "not group iso" doesn't matter, as this is a counterexample to both at once. Topologically they are distinct as $mathbbR$ is connected but $S^1 times mathbbZ$ is not (it's a stack of circles). Algebraically they're also distinct by looking at elements of order $2$ ($mathbbR$ has none, $S^1 times mathbbZ$ has at least one).






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Take $G = mathbbR$ and $H=mathbbZ$. The quotient $G/H$ is the circle $S^1$. The question is now to compare $mathbbR$ to $S^1 times mathbbZ$. Now, whether you interpret $ncong$ as "not topologically iso" or "not group iso" doesn't matter, as this is a counterexample to both at once. Topologically they are distinct as $mathbbR$ is connected but $S^1 times mathbbZ$ is not (it's a stack of circles). Algebraically they're also distinct by looking at elements of order $2$ ($mathbbR$ has none, $S^1 times mathbbZ$ has at least one).







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 3 hours ago









RandallRandall

10.7k11431




10.7k11431







  • 2




    $begingroup$
    As I said in response to your comment, I generally only think about connected groups, so made that assumption (perhaps unfairly for the OP). The disconnected case as you've mentioned is quite obviously no. I edited my post to reflect this.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    3 hours ago












  • 2




    $begingroup$
    As I said in response to your comment, I generally only think about connected groups, so made that assumption (perhaps unfairly for the OP). The disconnected case as you've mentioned is quite obviously no. I edited my post to reflect this.
    $endgroup$
    – Alex Youcis
    3 hours ago







2




2




$begingroup$
As I said in response to your comment, I generally only think about connected groups, so made that assumption (perhaps unfairly for the OP). The disconnected case as you've mentioned is quite obviously no. I edited my post to reflect this.
$endgroup$
– Alex Youcis
3 hours ago




$begingroup$
As I said in response to your comment, I generally only think about connected groups, so made that assumption (perhaps unfairly for the OP). The disconnected case as you've mentioned is quite obviously no. I edited my post to reflect this.
$endgroup$
– Alex Youcis
3 hours ago

















draft saved

draft discarded
















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid


  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function ()
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3179002%2fclosed-subgroups-of-abelian-groups%23new-answer', 'question_page');

);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

منجزی محتویات تیره‌های طایفه منجزی[ویرایش] مشاهیر طایفه منجزی[ویرایش] محل سکونت[ویرایش] پانویس[ویرایش] منابع[ویرایش] منوی ناوبری«نمودار اجتماعی طوایف بختیاری»«BakhtyārBAḴTĪĀRĪ TRIBE»«اسامی طوایف و شعب ایل بختیاری»ووگسترش آن

بیوانفورماتیک محتویات تاریخچه[ویرایش] اهداف[ویرایش] کاربردهای بیوانفورماتیک[ویرایش] زمینه‌های مهم بیوانفورماتیک[ویرایش] موضوعات سیستم نرم‌افزاری بیوانفورماتیک[ویرایش] مراکز و ابزار[ویرایش] جستارهای وابسته[ویرایش] پیوند به بیرون[ویرایش] منابع[ویرایش] منوی ناوبریووانجمن بیوانفورماتیک ایرانمرکز بیوانفورماتیک دانشگاه تهرانمرکز ملی تحقیقات بیوانفورماتیکانستیتو بیو-آی‌تیبانک داده‌های دی ان ایمرکز ملی اطلاعات بیوتکنولوژیانستیتوی بیوانفورماتیک اروپاپورتال بیوانفورماتیک ایران«فرهنگ واژه‌های مصوب فرهنگستان ـ دفتر هشتم، بخش لاتین»وووو4611085-900870420ووو