How does a Death Domain cleric's Touch of Death feature work with Touch-range spells delivered by familiars? Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Time to retire the [rules-as-written] tag?If my kobold uses a familiar to deliver Shocking Grasp, do I roll with advantage thanks to Pack Tactics?Can clerics use spell scrolls for spells they receive through their Divine domains?Familiar and touch spellsHow much will Vampiric Touch heal if combined with Touch of Death?Can the Death Cleric's Channel Divinity stack with the Paladin's Smite?I am neither a Wizard, nor a Warlock. How can I get a “full-featured” familiar?Does a touch-range spell cast using Find Familiar have to have line of sight from the caster?Can metamagic be applied to a spell delivered by a familiar?How does the Mirror Image spell interact with the Trickery cleric's Invoke Duplicity ability?Can a multiclassed barbarian/cleric use their Channel Divinity while raging?For a multiclassed cleric/wizard, can cleric class features be applied to my wizard spells, and vice versa?

How discoverable are IPv6 addresses and AAAA names by potential attackers?

Disable hyphenation for an entire paragraph

How to recreate this effect in Photoshop?

What happens to sewage if there is no river near by?

How to find all the available tools in macOS terminal?

Sorting numerically

What are 'alternative tunings' of a guitar and why would you use them? Doesn't it make it more difficult to play?

When -s is used with third person singular. What's its use in this context?

Java 8 stream max() function argument type Comparator vs Comparable

How do I keep my slimes from escaping their pens?

Using et al. for a last / senior author rather than for a first author

Is high blood pressure ever a symptom attributable solely to dehydration?

How widely used is the term Treppenwitz? Is it something that most Germans know?

What are the motives behind Cersei's orders given to Bronn?

What is the correct way to use the pinch test for dehydration?

Is the address of a local variable a constexpr?

How can I make names more distinctive without making them longer?

Why one of virtual NICs called bond0?

Why did the IBM 650 use bi-quinary?

How much radiation do nuclear physics experiments expose researchers to nowadays?

How can I fade player when goes inside or outside of the area?

If 'B is more likely given A', then 'A is more likely given B'

Letter Boxed validator

What makes black pepper strong or mild?



How does a Death Domain cleric's Touch of Death feature work with Touch-range spells delivered by familiars?



Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara
Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern)
Time to retire the [rules-as-written] tag?If my kobold uses a familiar to deliver Shocking Grasp, do I roll with advantage thanks to Pack Tactics?Can clerics use spell scrolls for spells they receive through their Divine domains?Familiar and touch spellsHow much will Vampiric Touch heal if combined with Touch of Death?Can the Death Cleric's Channel Divinity stack with the Paladin's Smite?I am neither a Wizard, nor a Warlock. How can I get a “full-featured” familiar?Does a touch-range spell cast using Find Familiar have to have line of sight from the caster?Can metamagic be applied to a spell delivered by a familiar?How does the Mirror Image spell interact with the Trickery cleric's Invoke Duplicity ability?Can a multiclassed barbarian/cleric use their Channel Divinity while raging?For a multiclassed cleric/wizard, can cleric class features be applied to my wizard spells, and vice versa?



.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty margin-bottom:0;








5












$begingroup$


My player is playing a Death Domain cleric. They have the Channel Divinity option Touch of Death (DMG, p. 97), which deals extra necrotic damage on a hit with a melee attack. They also have the find familiar spell from the Ritual Caster feat (PHB, p. 169), choosing the wizard spell list. They were wondering, based around the wording of find familiar, if a touch spell from the familiar can still trigger the Touch of Death ability.



Can a touch spell delivered by the familiar trigger the Death Domain cleric's Touch of Death?










share|improve this question











$endgroup$


















    5












    $begingroup$


    My player is playing a Death Domain cleric. They have the Channel Divinity option Touch of Death (DMG, p. 97), which deals extra necrotic damage on a hit with a melee attack. They also have the find familiar spell from the Ritual Caster feat (PHB, p. 169), choosing the wizard spell list. They were wondering, based around the wording of find familiar, if a touch spell from the familiar can still trigger the Touch of Death ability.



    Can a touch spell delivered by the familiar trigger the Death Domain cleric's Touch of Death?










    share|improve this question











    $endgroup$














      5












      5








      5





      $begingroup$


      My player is playing a Death Domain cleric. They have the Channel Divinity option Touch of Death (DMG, p. 97), which deals extra necrotic damage on a hit with a melee attack. They also have the find familiar spell from the Ritual Caster feat (PHB, p. 169), choosing the wizard spell list. They were wondering, based around the wording of find familiar, if a touch spell from the familiar can still trigger the Touch of Death ability.



      Can a touch spell delivered by the familiar trigger the Death Domain cleric's Touch of Death?










      share|improve this question











      $endgroup$




      My player is playing a Death Domain cleric. They have the Channel Divinity option Touch of Death (DMG, p. 97), which deals extra necrotic damage on a hit with a melee attack. They also have the find familiar spell from the Ritual Caster feat (PHB, p. 169), choosing the wizard spell list. They were wondering, based around the wording of find familiar, if a touch spell from the familiar can still trigger the Touch of Death ability.



      Can a touch spell delivered by the familiar trigger the Death Domain cleric's Touch of Death?







      dnd-5e spells class-feature cleric familiars






      share|improve this question















      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question








      edited 4 hours ago









      V2Blast

      27.3k595165




      27.3k595165










      asked 4 hours ago









      Brendan TriceBrendan Trice

      1086




      1086




















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          4












          $begingroup$

          Yes (arguably), as long as the familiar is delivering a spell that involves a melee spell attack



          The relevant section of find familiar says:




          Finally, when you cast a spell with a range of touch, your familiar can deliver the spell as if it had cast the spell. Your familiar must be within 100 feet of you, and it must use its reaction to deliver the spell when you cast it. If the spell requires an attack roll, you use your attack modifier for the roll.




          This line only applies to spells with a range of "Touch".



          The Death Domain cleric's Channel Divinity option, Touch of Death, says (DMG, p. 97):




          Starting at 2nd level, the cleric can use Channel Divinity to destroy another creature’s life force by touch.



          When the cleric hits a creature with a melee attack, the cleric can use Channel Divinity to deal extra necrotic damage to the target. The damage equals 5 + twice his or her cleric level.




          This only applies to melee attacks by the cleric. Since it's not specified, this applies to both melee weapon attacks and melee spell attacks.



          One example of a touch-range cleric spell that involves a melee spell attack is inflict wounds:




          Make a melee spell attack against a creature you can reach. On a hit, the target takes 3d10 necrotic damage.




          Thus, the question simply comes down to whether it counts as the cleric hitting the target if their familiar is delivering the spell.



          Since find familiar specifies that "If the spell requires an attack roll, you use your attack modifier for the roll", I'd argue that they're functionally equivalent. Thus, I'd rule as DM that any melee spell attack delivered by the familiar that hits qualifies for Touch of Death.



          The counterargument



          Of course, the reverse argument could be made, too. The familiar delivers the spell "as if it had cast the spell", so one could argue that aside from using your attack modifier, it's as if the familiar made the attack - and thus argue that if the familiar delivers a spell, the cleric is not the one making the attack so they can't use Touch of Death.



          It's ambiguous, and could be interpreted either way. Thus, the DM and players should come to a ruling that makes the most sense to them, and be consistent with it.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$












          • $begingroup$
            This answer to a related issue uses the opposite reasoning for the same quote. Just food for thought
            $endgroup$
            – David Coffron
            3 hours ago










          • $begingroup$
            @DavidCoffron: Fair enough! I did include "(arguably)" for a reason :P
            $endgroup$
            – V2Blast
            3 hours ago


















          0












          $begingroup$

          No. Channel Divinity abilities are not spells



          Forget the "touch" part - familiars can only cast spells, and Touch of Death is not a spell.



          The find familiar spell description reads:




          ...when you cast a spell with a range of touch, your familiar can
          deliver the spell as if it had cast the spell.




          This feature of find familiar only works on "spells". A "spell" is not just any magical ability; it is a defined term. From the Player's Handbook, p. 202:




          When a character casts any spell, the same basic rules are followed,
          regardless of the character’s class or the spell’s effects.



          Each spell description begins with a block of information, including
          the spell’s name, level, school of magic, casting time, range,
          components, and duration. The rest of a spell entry describes the
          spell’s effect.




          We know that Touch of Death is not a spell because it is missing some of the attributes described above: level, school of magic, and components. It also does not appear in the list of spells in the rule book.



          Not a spell, therefor the familiar can't cast it.






          share|improve this answer











          $endgroup$













            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function()
            var channelOptions =
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "122"
            ;
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function()
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled)
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function()
            createEditor();
            );

            else
            createEditor();

            );

            function createEditor()
            StackExchange.prepareEditor(
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader:
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            ,
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            );



            );













            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function ()
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145269%2fhow-does-a-death-domain-clerics-touch-of-death-feature-work-with-touch-range-sp%23new-answer', 'question_page');

            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            4












            $begingroup$

            Yes (arguably), as long as the familiar is delivering a spell that involves a melee spell attack



            The relevant section of find familiar says:




            Finally, when you cast a spell with a range of touch, your familiar can deliver the spell as if it had cast the spell. Your familiar must be within 100 feet of you, and it must use its reaction to deliver the spell when you cast it. If the spell requires an attack roll, you use your attack modifier for the roll.




            This line only applies to spells with a range of "Touch".



            The Death Domain cleric's Channel Divinity option, Touch of Death, says (DMG, p. 97):




            Starting at 2nd level, the cleric can use Channel Divinity to destroy another creature’s life force by touch.



            When the cleric hits a creature with a melee attack, the cleric can use Channel Divinity to deal extra necrotic damage to the target. The damage equals 5 + twice his or her cleric level.




            This only applies to melee attacks by the cleric. Since it's not specified, this applies to both melee weapon attacks and melee spell attacks.



            One example of a touch-range cleric spell that involves a melee spell attack is inflict wounds:




            Make a melee spell attack against a creature you can reach. On a hit, the target takes 3d10 necrotic damage.




            Thus, the question simply comes down to whether it counts as the cleric hitting the target if their familiar is delivering the spell.



            Since find familiar specifies that "If the spell requires an attack roll, you use your attack modifier for the roll", I'd argue that they're functionally equivalent. Thus, I'd rule as DM that any melee spell attack delivered by the familiar that hits qualifies for Touch of Death.



            The counterargument



            Of course, the reverse argument could be made, too. The familiar delivers the spell "as if it had cast the spell", so one could argue that aside from using your attack modifier, it's as if the familiar made the attack - and thus argue that if the familiar delivers a spell, the cleric is not the one making the attack so they can't use Touch of Death.



            It's ambiguous, and could be interpreted either way. Thus, the DM and players should come to a ruling that makes the most sense to them, and be consistent with it.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              This answer to a related issue uses the opposite reasoning for the same quote. Just food for thought
              $endgroup$
              – David Coffron
              3 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @DavidCoffron: Fair enough! I did include "(arguably)" for a reason :P
              $endgroup$
              – V2Blast
              3 hours ago















            4












            $begingroup$

            Yes (arguably), as long as the familiar is delivering a spell that involves a melee spell attack



            The relevant section of find familiar says:




            Finally, when you cast a spell with a range of touch, your familiar can deliver the spell as if it had cast the spell. Your familiar must be within 100 feet of you, and it must use its reaction to deliver the spell when you cast it. If the spell requires an attack roll, you use your attack modifier for the roll.




            This line only applies to spells with a range of "Touch".



            The Death Domain cleric's Channel Divinity option, Touch of Death, says (DMG, p. 97):




            Starting at 2nd level, the cleric can use Channel Divinity to destroy another creature’s life force by touch.



            When the cleric hits a creature with a melee attack, the cleric can use Channel Divinity to deal extra necrotic damage to the target. The damage equals 5 + twice his or her cleric level.




            This only applies to melee attacks by the cleric. Since it's not specified, this applies to both melee weapon attacks and melee spell attacks.



            One example of a touch-range cleric spell that involves a melee spell attack is inflict wounds:




            Make a melee spell attack against a creature you can reach. On a hit, the target takes 3d10 necrotic damage.




            Thus, the question simply comes down to whether it counts as the cleric hitting the target if their familiar is delivering the spell.



            Since find familiar specifies that "If the spell requires an attack roll, you use your attack modifier for the roll", I'd argue that they're functionally equivalent. Thus, I'd rule as DM that any melee spell attack delivered by the familiar that hits qualifies for Touch of Death.



            The counterargument



            Of course, the reverse argument could be made, too. The familiar delivers the spell "as if it had cast the spell", so one could argue that aside from using your attack modifier, it's as if the familiar made the attack - and thus argue that if the familiar delivers a spell, the cleric is not the one making the attack so they can't use Touch of Death.



            It's ambiguous, and could be interpreted either way. Thus, the DM and players should come to a ruling that makes the most sense to them, and be consistent with it.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$












            • $begingroup$
              This answer to a related issue uses the opposite reasoning for the same quote. Just food for thought
              $endgroup$
              – David Coffron
              3 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @DavidCoffron: Fair enough! I did include "(arguably)" for a reason :P
              $endgroup$
              – V2Blast
              3 hours ago













            4












            4








            4





            $begingroup$

            Yes (arguably), as long as the familiar is delivering a spell that involves a melee spell attack



            The relevant section of find familiar says:




            Finally, when you cast a spell with a range of touch, your familiar can deliver the spell as if it had cast the spell. Your familiar must be within 100 feet of you, and it must use its reaction to deliver the spell when you cast it. If the spell requires an attack roll, you use your attack modifier for the roll.




            This line only applies to spells with a range of "Touch".



            The Death Domain cleric's Channel Divinity option, Touch of Death, says (DMG, p. 97):




            Starting at 2nd level, the cleric can use Channel Divinity to destroy another creature’s life force by touch.



            When the cleric hits a creature with a melee attack, the cleric can use Channel Divinity to deal extra necrotic damage to the target. The damage equals 5 + twice his or her cleric level.




            This only applies to melee attacks by the cleric. Since it's not specified, this applies to both melee weapon attacks and melee spell attacks.



            One example of a touch-range cleric spell that involves a melee spell attack is inflict wounds:




            Make a melee spell attack against a creature you can reach. On a hit, the target takes 3d10 necrotic damage.




            Thus, the question simply comes down to whether it counts as the cleric hitting the target if their familiar is delivering the spell.



            Since find familiar specifies that "If the spell requires an attack roll, you use your attack modifier for the roll", I'd argue that they're functionally equivalent. Thus, I'd rule as DM that any melee spell attack delivered by the familiar that hits qualifies for Touch of Death.



            The counterargument



            Of course, the reverse argument could be made, too. The familiar delivers the spell "as if it had cast the spell", so one could argue that aside from using your attack modifier, it's as if the familiar made the attack - and thus argue that if the familiar delivers a spell, the cleric is not the one making the attack so they can't use Touch of Death.



            It's ambiguous, and could be interpreted either way. Thus, the DM and players should come to a ruling that makes the most sense to them, and be consistent with it.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$



            Yes (arguably), as long as the familiar is delivering a spell that involves a melee spell attack



            The relevant section of find familiar says:




            Finally, when you cast a spell with a range of touch, your familiar can deliver the spell as if it had cast the spell. Your familiar must be within 100 feet of you, and it must use its reaction to deliver the spell when you cast it. If the spell requires an attack roll, you use your attack modifier for the roll.




            This line only applies to spells with a range of "Touch".



            The Death Domain cleric's Channel Divinity option, Touch of Death, says (DMG, p. 97):




            Starting at 2nd level, the cleric can use Channel Divinity to destroy another creature’s life force by touch.



            When the cleric hits a creature with a melee attack, the cleric can use Channel Divinity to deal extra necrotic damage to the target. The damage equals 5 + twice his or her cleric level.




            This only applies to melee attacks by the cleric. Since it's not specified, this applies to both melee weapon attacks and melee spell attacks.



            One example of a touch-range cleric spell that involves a melee spell attack is inflict wounds:




            Make a melee spell attack against a creature you can reach. On a hit, the target takes 3d10 necrotic damage.




            Thus, the question simply comes down to whether it counts as the cleric hitting the target if their familiar is delivering the spell.



            Since find familiar specifies that "If the spell requires an attack roll, you use your attack modifier for the roll", I'd argue that they're functionally equivalent. Thus, I'd rule as DM that any melee spell attack delivered by the familiar that hits qualifies for Touch of Death.



            The counterargument



            Of course, the reverse argument could be made, too. The familiar delivers the spell "as if it had cast the spell", so one could argue that aside from using your attack modifier, it's as if the familiar made the attack - and thus argue that if the familiar delivers a spell, the cleric is not the one making the attack so they can't use Touch of Death.



            It's ambiguous, and could be interpreted either way. Thus, the DM and players should come to a ruling that makes the most sense to them, and be consistent with it.







            share|improve this answer














            share|improve this answer



            share|improve this answer








            edited 3 hours ago

























            answered 3 hours ago









            V2BlastV2Blast

            27.3k595165




            27.3k595165











            • $begingroup$
              This answer to a related issue uses the opposite reasoning for the same quote. Just food for thought
              $endgroup$
              – David Coffron
              3 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @DavidCoffron: Fair enough! I did include "(arguably)" for a reason :P
              $endgroup$
              – V2Blast
              3 hours ago
















            • $begingroup$
              This answer to a related issue uses the opposite reasoning for the same quote. Just food for thought
              $endgroup$
              – David Coffron
              3 hours ago










            • $begingroup$
              @DavidCoffron: Fair enough! I did include "(arguably)" for a reason :P
              $endgroup$
              – V2Blast
              3 hours ago















            $begingroup$
            This answer to a related issue uses the opposite reasoning for the same quote. Just food for thought
            $endgroup$
            – David Coffron
            3 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            This answer to a related issue uses the opposite reasoning for the same quote. Just food for thought
            $endgroup$
            – David Coffron
            3 hours ago












            $begingroup$
            @DavidCoffron: Fair enough! I did include "(arguably)" for a reason :P
            $endgroup$
            – V2Blast
            3 hours ago




            $begingroup$
            @DavidCoffron: Fair enough! I did include "(arguably)" for a reason :P
            $endgroup$
            – V2Blast
            3 hours ago













            0












            $begingroup$

            No. Channel Divinity abilities are not spells



            Forget the "touch" part - familiars can only cast spells, and Touch of Death is not a spell.



            The find familiar spell description reads:




            ...when you cast a spell with a range of touch, your familiar can
            deliver the spell as if it had cast the spell.




            This feature of find familiar only works on "spells". A "spell" is not just any magical ability; it is a defined term. From the Player's Handbook, p. 202:




            When a character casts any spell, the same basic rules are followed,
            regardless of the character’s class or the spell’s effects.



            Each spell description begins with a block of information, including
            the spell’s name, level, school of magic, casting time, range,
            components, and duration. The rest of a spell entry describes the
            spell’s effect.




            We know that Touch of Death is not a spell because it is missing some of the attributes described above: level, school of magic, and components. It also does not appear in the list of spells in the rule book.



            Not a spell, therefor the familiar can't cast it.






            share|improve this answer











            $endgroup$

















              0












              $begingroup$

              No. Channel Divinity abilities are not spells



              Forget the "touch" part - familiars can only cast spells, and Touch of Death is not a spell.



              The find familiar spell description reads:




              ...when you cast a spell with a range of touch, your familiar can
              deliver the spell as if it had cast the spell.




              This feature of find familiar only works on "spells". A "spell" is not just any magical ability; it is a defined term. From the Player's Handbook, p. 202:




              When a character casts any spell, the same basic rules are followed,
              regardless of the character’s class or the spell’s effects.



              Each spell description begins with a block of information, including
              the spell’s name, level, school of magic, casting time, range,
              components, and duration. The rest of a spell entry describes the
              spell’s effect.




              We know that Touch of Death is not a spell because it is missing some of the attributes described above: level, school of magic, and components. It also does not appear in the list of spells in the rule book.



              Not a spell, therefor the familiar can't cast it.






              share|improve this answer











              $endgroup$















                0












                0








                0





                $begingroup$

                No. Channel Divinity abilities are not spells



                Forget the "touch" part - familiars can only cast spells, and Touch of Death is not a spell.



                The find familiar spell description reads:




                ...when you cast a spell with a range of touch, your familiar can
                deliver the spell as if it had cast the spell.




                This feature of find familiar only works on "spells". A "spell" is not just any magical ability; it is a defined term. From the Player's Handbook, p. 202:




                When a character casts any spell, the same basic rules are followed,
                regardless of the character’s class or the spell’s effects.



                Each spell description begins with a block of information, including
                the spell’s name, level, school of magic, casting time, range,
                components, and duration. The rest of a spell entry describes the
                spell’s effect.




                We know that Touch of Death is not a spell because it is missing some of the attributes described above: level, school of magic, and components. It also does not appear in the list of spells in the rule book.



                Not a spell, therefor the familiar can't cast it.






                share|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                No. Channel Divinity abilities are not spells



                Forget the "touch" part - familiars can only cast spells, and Touch of Death is not a spell.



                The find familiar spell description reads:




                ...when you cast a spell with a range of touch, your familiar can
                deliver the spell as if it had cast the spell.




                This feature of find familiar only works on "spells". A "spell" is not just any magical ability; it is a defined term. From the Player's Handbook, p. 202:




                When a character casts any spell, the same basic rules are followed,
                regardless of the character’s class or the spell’s effects.



                Each spell description begins with a block of information, including
                the spell’s name, level, school of magic, casting time, range,
                components, and duration. The rest of a spell entry describes the
                spell’s effect.




                We know that Touch of Death is not a spell because it is missing some of the attributes described above: level, school of magic, and components. It also does not appear in the list of spells in the rule book.



                Not a spell, therefor the familiar can't cast it.







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited 47 mins ago

























                answered 58 mins ago









                Pink SweetenerPink Sweetener

                3,1631629




                3,1631629



























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded
















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Role-playing Games Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid


                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.

                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function ()
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2frpg.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f145269%2fhow-does-a-death-domain-clerics-touch-of-death-feature-work-with-touch-range-sp%23new-answer', 'question_page');

                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    یوتیوب محتویات پیشینه[ویرایش] فناوری‌های ویدئویی[ویرایش] شوخی‌های آوریل[ویرایش] سانسور و فیلترینگ[ویرایش] آمار و ارقامی از یوتیوب[ویرایش] تأثیر اجتماعی[ویرایش] سیاست اجتماعی[ویرایش] نمودارها[ویرایش] یادداشت‌ها[ویرایش] پانویس[ویرایش] پیوند به بیرون[ویرایش] منوی ناوبریبررسی شده‌استYouTube.com[بروزرسانی]"Youtube.com Site Info""زبان‌های یوتیوب""Surprise! There's a third YouTube co-founder"سایت یوتیوب برای چندمین بار در ایران فیلتر شدنسخهٔ اصلیسالار کمانگر جوان آمریکایی ایرانی الاصل مدیر سایت یوتیوب شدنسخهٔ اصلیVideo websites pop up, invite postingsthe originalthe originalYouTube: Overnight success has sparked a backlashthe original"Me at the zoo"YouTube serves up 100 million videos a day onlinethe originalcomScore Releases May 2010 U.S. Online Video Rankingsthe originalYouTube hits 4 billion daily video viewsthe originalYouTube users uploading two days of video every minutethe originalEric Schmidt, Princeton Colloquium on Public & Int'l Affairsthe original«Streaming Dreams»نسخهٔ اصلیAlexa Traffic Rank for YouTube (three month average)the originalHelp! YouTube is killing my business!the originalUtube sues YouTubethe originalGoogle closes $A2b YouTube dealthe originalFlash moves on to smart phonesthe originalYouTube HTML5 Video Playerنسخهٔ اصلیYouTube HTML5 Video Playerthe originalGoogle tries freeing Web video with WebMthe originalVideo length for uploadingthe originalYouTube caps video lengths to reduce infringementthe originalAccount Types: Longer videosthe originalYouTube bumps video limit to 15 minutesthe originalUploading large files and resumable uploadingthe originalVideo Formats: File formatsthe originalGetting Started: File formatsthe originalThe quest for a new video codec in Flash 8the originalAdobe Flash Video File Format Specification Version 10.1the originalYouTube Mobile goes livethe originalYouTube videos go HD with a simple hackthe originalYouTube now supports 4k-resolution videosthe originalYouTube to get high-def 1080p playerthe original«Approximate YouTube Bitrates»نسخهٔ اصلی«Bigger and Better: Encoding for YouTube 720p HD»نسخهٔ اصلی«YouTube's 1080p – Failure Depends on How You Look At It»نسخهٔ اصلیYouTube in 3Dthe originalYouTube in 3D?the originalYouTube 3D Videosthe originalYouTube adds a dimension, 3D goggles not includedthe originalYouTube Adds Stereoscopic 3D Video Support (And 3D Vision Support, Too)the original«Sharing YouTube Videos»نسخهٔ اصلی«Downloading videos from YouTube is not supported, except for one instance when it is permitted.»نسخهٔ اصلی«Terms of Use, 5.B»نسخهٔ اصلی«Some YouTube videos get download option»نسخهٔ اصلی«YouTube looks out for content owners, disables video ripping»«Downloading videos from YouTube is not supported, except for one instance when it is permitted.»نسخهٔ اصلی«YouTube Hopes To Boost Revenue With Video Downloads»نسخهٔ اصلی«YouTube Mobile»نسخهٔ اصلی«YouTube Live on Apple TV Today; Coming to iPhone on June 29»نسخهٔ اصلی«Goodbye Flash: YouTube mobile goes HTML5 on iPhone and Android»نسخهٔ اصلی«YouTube Mobile Goes HTML5, Video Quality Beats Native Apps Hands Down»نسخهٔ اصلی«TiVo Getting YouTube Streaming Today»نسخهٔ اصلی«YouTube video comes to Wii and PlayStation 3 game consoles»نسخهٔ اصلی«Coming Up Next... YouTube on Your TV»نسخهٔ اصلی«Experience YouTube XL on the Big Screen»نسخهٔ اصلی«Xbox Live Getting Live TV, YouTube & Bing Voice Search»نسخهٔ اصلی«YouTube content locations»نسخهٔ اصلی«April fools: YouTube turns the world up-side-down»نسخهٔ اصلی«YouTube goes back to 1911 for April Fools' Day»نسخهٔ اصلی«Simon Cowell's bromance, the self-driving Nascar and Hungry Hippos for iPad... the best April Fools' gags»نسخهٔ اصلی"YouTube Announces It Will Shut Down""YouTube Adds Darude 'Sandstorm' Button To Its Videos For April Fools' Day"«Censorship fears rise as Iran blocks access to top websites»نسخهٔ اصلی«China 'blocks YouTube video site'»نسخهٔ اصلی«YouTube shut down in Morocco»نسخهٔ اصلی«Thailand blocks access to YouTube»نسخهٔ اصلی«Ban on YouTube lifted after deal»نسخهٔ اصلی«Google's Gatekeepers»نسخهٔ اصلی«Turkey goes into battle with Google»نسخهٔ اصلی«Turkey lifts two-year ban on YouTube»نسخهٔ اصلیسانسور در ترکیه به یوتیوب رسیدلغو فیلترینگ یوتیوب در ترکیه«Pakistan blocks YouTube website»نسخهٔ اصلی«Pakistan lifts the ban on YouTube»نسخهٔ اصلی«Pakistan blocks access to YouTube in internet crackdown»نسخهٔ اصلی«Watchdog urges Libya to stop blocking websites»نسخهٔ اصلی«YouTube»نسخهٔ اصلی«Due to abuses of religion, customs Emirates, YouTube is blocked in the UAE»نسخهٔ اصلی«Google Conquered The Web - An Ultimate Winner»نسخهٔ اصلی«100 million videos are viewed daily on YouTube»نسخهٔ اصلی«Harry and Charlie Davies-Carr: Web gets taste for biting baby»نسخهٔ اصلی«Meet YouTube's 224 million girl, Natalie Tran»نسخهٔ اصلی«YouTube to Double Down on Its 'Channel' Experiment»نسخهٔ اصلی«13 Some Media Companies Choose to Profit From Pirated YouTube Clips»نسخهٔ اصلی«Irate HK man unlikely Web hero»نسخهٔ اصلی«Web Guitar Wizard Revealed at Last»نسخهٔ اصلی«Charlie bit my finger – again!»نسخهٔ اصلی«Lowered Expectations: Web Redefines 'Quality'»نسخهٔ اصلی«YouTube's 50 Greatest Viral Videos»نسخهٔ اصلیYouTube Community Guidelinesthe original«Why did my YouTube account get closed down?»نسخهٔ اصلی«Why do I have a sanction on my account?»نسخهٔ اصلی«Is YouTube's three-strike rule fair to users?»نسخهٔ اصلی«Viacom will sue YouTube for $1bn»نسخهٔ اصلی«Mediaset Files EUR500 Million Suit Vs Google's YouTube»نسخهٔ اصلی«Premier League to take action against YouTube»نسخهٔ اصلی«YouTube law fight 'threatens net'»نسخهٔ اصلی«Google must divulge YouTube log»نسخهٔ اصلی«Google Told to Turn Over User Data of YouTube»نسخهٔ اصلی«US judge tosses out Viacom copyright suit against YouTube»نسخهٔ اصلی«Google and Viacom: YouTube copyright lawsuit back on»نسخهٔ اصلی«Woman can sue over YouTube clip de-posting»نسخهٔ اصلی«YouTube loses court battle over music clips»نسخهٔ اصلیYouTube to Test Software To Ease Licensing Fightsthe original«Press Statistics»نسخهٔ اصلی«Testing YouTube's Audio Content ID System»نسخهٔ اصلی«Content ID disputes»نسخهٔ اصلیYouTube Community Guidelinesthe originalYouTube criticized in Germany over anti-Semitic Nazi videosthe originalFury as YouTube carries sick Hillsboro video insultthe originalYouTube attacked by MPs over sex and violence footagethe originalAl-Awlaki's YouTube Videos Targeted by Rep. Weinerthe originalYouTube Withdraws Cleric's Videosthe originalYouTube is letting users decide on terrorism-related videosthe original«Time's Person of the Year: You»نسخهٔ اصلی«Our top 10 funniest YouTube comments – what are yours?»نسخهٔ اصلی«YouTube's worst comments blocked by filter»نسخهٔ اصلی«Site Info YouTube»نسخهٔ اصلیوبگاه YouTubeوبگاه موبایل YouTubeوووووو

                    Magento 2 - Auto login with specific URL Planned maintenance scheduled April 23, 2019 at 23:30 UTC (7:30pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?Customer can't login - Page refreshes but nothing happensCustom Login page redirectURL to login with redirect URL after completionCustomer login is case sensitiveLogin with phone number or email address - Magento 1.9Magento 2: Set Customer Account Confirmation StatusCustomer auto connect from URLHow to call customer login form in the custom module action magento 2?Change of customer login error message magento2Referrer URL in modal login form

                    Rest API with Magento using PHP with example. Planned maintenance scheduled April 17/18, 2019 at 00:00UTC (8:00pm US/Eastern) Announcing the arrival of Valued Associate #679: Cesar Manara Unicorn Meta Zoo #1: Why another podcast?How to update product using magento client library for PHP?Oauth Error while extending Magento Rest APINot showing my custom api in wsdl(url) and web service list?Using Magento API(REST) via IXMLHTTPRequest COM ObjectHow to login in Magento website using REST APIREST api call for Guest userMagento API calling using HTML and javascriptUse API rest media management by storeView code (admin)Magento REST API Example ErrorsHow to log all rest api calls in magento2?How to update product using magento client library for PHP?